on conscience and cloning
you speak with a voice
that is the voice of your thoughts,
you think with a voice
that is the voice of your word;
but neither word, nor voice nor thought
derive from what seems to be the single source
of word, and voice and thought.
word: cerebral construction
of concepts, and of forms and of substance;
thought: vibrations, sense of feeling,
enigma of the human being,
and a word is easy to pronounce,
light to say,
but sometimes, alas, too heavy to listen to;
and these forms
which express the feelings of a human being,
all derive from man's conscience.
this conscience so heavy,
so vital, so absolute
and essential for the growth of human existence
is always, I won't say forgotten,
but is always set aside, sheltered
not in the form of disrespect
nor in the form of negation,
but in the form of superficiality.
when we talk of conscience
very little is understood about what this word contains.
if man managed to realize
what the word conscience contained
perhaps he wouldn't even dare to pronounce it
at any moment of his day
or at certain moments of his day.
to speak of conscience is like speaking about God:
can we talk about God all the time?
is it always possible to sense in this interior silence
where all of what man feels is heading towards,
can one talk of this silence,
so enormous, so overwhelming,
where only God can be present?
is it possible to talk at any time,
about this silence?
no.
equally, one cannot always talk about conscience
equally one cannot always understand
what conscience contains.
man gets used to sounds
man gets used to words
man pierces thoughts with questions
with fears with anguish with anxiety,
but man does not nourish thought
with the investigation of the content of certain words
which, though in themselves incomplete,
though in themselves not exhaustive
they can nevertheless give that abstract form
they can nevertheless give that long-sought intuition
they can nevertheless give that quiver of conscience
of the content of their meanings
no sooner is it seen than it vanishes,
but remains like a flash
but remains like a fingerprint in that feeling
in that perception of conscience
that is the part in which man is reflected
to compare himself with his spirit
in a state of awareness
and in a state of illumination.
this word that you now express
does it come from your conscience
or from another conscience?
is there separate conscience
or is there unified conscience?
the answer is difficult,
the answer is difficult for you human beings
who do not manage to fully comprehend
what conscience contains,
the answer is difficult for us to you human beings
whose words contain comprehension of form
but not comprehension of their substance.
words are poor, not useless but poor,
words are unsuitable
to describe or to contain
what is contained in existence.
human conscience belongs
to that all-encompassing all-encompassed whole
that is divine manifestation.
superior human conscience senses the individual
who slowly approaches understanding
of what conscience contains.
human conscience is that difference
that one notices among men
that exists between men
that progresses between one man and the next.
human conscience will arrive at its end
with the end of all that can be contained in the cycle of the flesh,
human conscience overcomes time,
overcomes space, overcomes the seasons of humanity.
human conscience unifies time, space and the seasons of humanity.
human conscience is light
that contains that contemplates the divine spark
where the present the future the past is expressed.
the divine spark in separate form
in unified substance where all appears
where everything is, where everything is to come
where everything is in essence, where everything is in being.
human conscience that forms
and transforms the individual in its forms,
human conscience that gives the urge,
human conscience that gives courage,
human conscience that makes one dare
human conscience that makes one become
human conscience that is
in its function of grandeur
in its function of mutating motor.
friendly human conscience
united human conscience
human conscience progressing in its duty of unification.
you have well understood the content of the message
you have well understood the complexity of the message
you have well understood the vastness of the message.
you have well understood that which even man cannot contain
you have well understood that which even man can contain.
you have well understood
what you define as fundamental ramifications,
what you define as active connections;
you have well understood what happens within time
and what is outside time.
your question, albeit unexpressed
but kept within yourself in your thoughts
in your heart, in your feelings,
your question about cloning
your question about stem cells
your question about the point of man's science
who sees nothing if not earth
who sees nothing if not physicality,
your question about the point of separation
between good and evil events
and in the point of unification
of good and evil events,
could your question find exhaustive answers,
could it find a complete answer,
in the complexity, the universality of human existence?
this jumble of existence
that in its oneness focuses exclusively on good,
is fragmented by segments of evil.
the duality that every man lives in his existence
is a duality that moves towards the cancellation of evil
via its overcoming.
but evil exists.
if evil must be overcome, it exists.
evil is not an abstraction, evil is reality,
it is operative reality, it is a reality of intelligence,
it is a reality of intentions, it is devious reality
of volition, of people, of power.
evil exists and operates on every level
material, intentional, physical.
evil works in a particular way
in what you call superior intellective level.
here we come back to the concept of the question
of whether cloning is an impassable
or passable limit.
but what limit do we mean? Of what limit do we speak?
the surmountable borderline of evil over good?
or the insurmountable borderline of good over evil?
do limits exist?
no
there are limits that man can slowly overcome
limits given by arrogance
limits given by all-knowingness
limits given and overcome by intelligence.
man overcomes these limits
the overcoming of limits doesn't always bring good,
not everything that seems good is always good.
stem cells seem good
they are hailed as the result of good research
to achieve good.
is cloning perhaps good?
is cloning daring that which cannot be dared?
does cloning point to the improvement of mankind?
or does it only aim at paying back the human ambition
of those who have brought silence inside themselves
not to hear God but to hear Satan.
Satan promised Christ too
the glory and honour of the world.
with this intelligence contained in these human individualities
whose mental state is very well organised
the impulse of the affirmation of self is received,
the command of ambition is received and obeyed,
the command of power of this negative force
that man calls Satan.
cloning, stem cells,
do nothing but satisfy
what human ambition wants to contain and achieve.
they do nothing but satisfy that need
to pass limits but not for man's good
but for the apparent good of a transient grandeur,
of an illusory grandeur that the negative,
that evil wants to concede,
wants to realise just for man
the creation of the need for omnipotence.
man, in the moment that he lives the darkness of God
because God allows him to live in darkness,
man in his need for omnipotence
wants to change places with what is the absolute of life,
wants to change places with what is the commandment of life.
but what commandment could it be
that doesn't contemplate God?
what commandment could it be
that doesn't feel love?
scientists, brains
that push for the results of cloning
that push for power
the power of the wealth of arrogance
of the haughtiness of pride,
they are certainly not motivated by love for humanity.
cloning is not good
cloning cannot be good:
cloning brings suffering
cloning brings slavery.
cloning brings a lack of freedom
cloning brings a reversion of evolution.
cloning is not progress
cloning is apparent progress
but not towards the light but towards that darkness
in which God allows man to live
because man can,
when his time comes,
understand that darkness that he lived
in order to distance himself from it, overcome it
albeit not eliminate it.
what can a single man do
when faced with planetary forces
which push him towards the darkness
which push him towards that imposed commandment of life
which is only matter
which is only physicality
which is the conquest of power?
what can an individual do?
it seems that individual can do little
but the individual has the possibility to do very much.
every individual who feels love within himself,
feels the presence of the spirit;
every individual who in himself
has understood the duality of the humanity,
every individual who in himself
contemplates the duality of humanity
and who chooses the life of positivity
in striving for love and brotherhood,
as already stated, every individual
erects himself like a wall,
like a wall of conscience
like a wall of containment
like a wall of border lines
to confront this oncoming wave,
of forces in the evil that want to overrun
everything that can be overrun.
we always say that goodness works in silence
we always know that evil works
through the resounding connection of voices
and through the wills expressed in terms of change,
in terms of communication,
in terms of political announcements, war,
in terms of scientific breakthroughs.
an act of goodness never makes the news
but an act of goodness is never lost
an act of goodness is never an unlived reality
an act of goodness is never a dissolved reality.
an act of goodness is always sacred reality.
and you man
don't be discouraged, don't give up.
live your time choosing acts of goodness
although it will never be recognised
although it will never be communicated
although it will never be expressed.
what seems to be does not count
what counts is what is.
convince yourself of this great truth.
what counts is what you feel
what counts is what puts you in communication with your conscience
what counts is what your conscience comes into being
through your continuous striving for good.
what counts is all you can build
not, of course, with earthly bricks
that time will crumble
as past civilizations have crumbled
and as those of the present and the future will crumble.
what counts is all you build in this
marvellous and enigmatic edifice,
marvellous and unknown to your conscience
through all those good moments
silent and chosen by you in your daily effort of living.